John,
Searching can be done easily enough through Google, as someone
helpfully pointed out a few months ago. A Google program scans this
site once a day. Just plug your query into Google and put
'site:oroad.com' after it, and hit Search. I remember starting a
minor war in 2002 when I suggested a moderator (and I'm not claiming
I was the first). The idea went down badly; and at the end of the
day, the jerks always seem to get lost as real users keep posting.
As with Clancy, I thought the graphix and pictures at New
Volkswebbin' looked good, but they made my browser foul up. And it
never really took off. I think it would have been better to make the
changeover in one hit - store all the old posts first of all, then
shut the forum down completely and just provide the link to New
Volkswebbin'. Or maybe this site could be kept as a read-only
archive of info, linked to the new version.
Personally I have no problem with this site as it stands. I don't yet
see - or maybe I just don't understand - why change is necessary
right now. But if I HAD to migrate to a new site to keep up with the
regulars I would do so, and I'll try it if they will. Maybe Darren's
new site deserves a second shot?
Sam F.
Clancy wrote:
>
> John:
> To
> a
> large
> degree,
> I
> concur....and
> Darren
> has
> tried
> it.
> In
> May
> 2003
> he
> took
> the
> bold
> step
> and
> launched
> a
> "new"
> Volkswebbin'.
> Take
> a
> look
> at
> the
> thread:
>
http://www.oroad.com/volkswebbin/wall/g … ssage=8459
> and take a look at the new site he has linked.
>
> Great "modern" look, in fact if you weren't careful, you wouldn't be
> able to tell if you were on the ShopTalk Forums or the Samba, or
> several other sites. Several of us went over there and registered.
> Bottom line: It never took hold. (take a look at the single ad
> posted in November in the classifieds there....I sure hope he didn't
> need to sell that Fastback quickly) Why? Well, my guess is that
> until you totally pull the plug on the Volkswebbin' "Classic", most
> of us don't have enough momentum to justify leaving an old site with
> which we've all grown familiar. Kind of like the cars we drive. Sure
> I like the heater in my wife's car on the below zero mornings we've
> had recently, but it hasn't stopped me from driving my '65 every
> day. Why? It's not safer, it leaves my clothes smelling of old oil
> fouled heater boxes, the headlights are dim, etc.etc. I guess that
> I'm just more 'tuned' to it than I probably should be.
>
> As for the search function, yep, you're right... the old software
> just can't handle the mass of data here. Moderator? Again, it would
> really be helpful on occasions. But look at the other sites that do
> have moderators; sometimes I wonder just what their moderators do?
> We have our occasional "spoiled brats" but usually their attention
> spans are limited and they tire easily.
>
> OK, that's probably more like 9¢, from me. It will be interesting
to
> hear what others have to offer. By the way, the utter lack of frills
> (graphics, etc.) on this site allows it to load so much quicker for
> me on my dial up than the modern sites. Your mileage may vary.
> Clancy
>
>
>